|
| Click on the first letter of your favourite model |
|
|
|
|
Natalia A |
|
|
AKA: Brigita, Nalalia
ICGID: NA-83YR
Born [dd-mm-yy]: 1983
Birthplace:  Ukraine
Started Modelling: 2007
Retired:
Measurements: 91-62-93
Height: 165 cm
Piercings: None
Hair Colour: Red
Breasts: Medium (Real)
Official Site:
Interview Page:
Social Network:
Tattoos: None
Agency:
|
Image courtesy of FEMJOY
|
Tags: ukraine, red hair, medium natural breasts
|
Page Credits: Midwest Davey, beowulf, MetMonk, The Baron, RASDARK, spazmatix, Sheppo, BobM, einfach, YAAZ, JeanN
|
|
Tell me more?
Bio:
Natalia is a young artist. She is interested in exotic countries and dreams to visit each of them. She likes to read and write verses.
 theNUDE of the Month October 2011 (3604 votes)
theNUDE of the Month December 2011 (3811 votes) |
WEB LINKS:
MODEL PAGES:
ESSENTIALS:
| Last 10 comments |
03-02-12 (WabiSabi) Reply |
| With many point, I agree with am4getful. I hope main purpose of cover-rating to be browsing convenience and fun, not for awarding. Most disappointing thing is only top 10 covers are showed. Very few opportunity to discover good cover. I think all rated covers browsable style is good, like cover search results. Then some sorting order selectable, total votes, latest voted, weighted average, and rating (raw average) as just one of them. Then tags, sites, release dates, appliable as filter.
I read a complain about right side Covers Top 10. Since appearing covers tend to get negative votes and pulled down, not to shown this area voting favorite covers lower. I also doing similar. IMO, just showing latest voted covers would be good.
Results of Top 10 voted covers February is annoying. Top 1 to 3 are all rated 10.0 . Probably short time of end of month, some people voted once. I worry this may giving motivation to cheaters. Top 10 covers March may all 10.0 . With voting, removing all cheating or mal-voting is impossible. But reducing design is available, current design needs much improvement.
I'm a staff, but not taking part with site implementation. Sorry I may be irresponsible, but as a user I'm writing. BTW, this is off-topic of Natalia A, discussion board for entire site would be useful. |
| 02-29-12 (russell) Reply |
| am4getful - thanks, that's the idea we had. The models have taken over the site when the covers are the real focus. In the pipeline for the covers: a tagging system and a tag cloud. (:R |
| 02-29-12 (am4getful) Reply |
For a site about covers, cover voting makes sense. I have no idea what the best voting system would be. What I like most about the current system is that it often gives us new covers to look at.
The site has over 148000 covers. There's no way I'll ever see them all. The voting system gives other visitors a chance to find covers they like and get them into the top ten for a time. I may not find most very interesting - tastes differ. But I've seen many very nice covers come into the top ten (and most then go). This way I get a chance to find new photographers or models I might want to learn more about. I might also be reminded of the talents of an "old" photographer I've come to take for granted.
Whatever happens with the cover voting in the future, I hope it continues to be fairly easy for visitors to submit covers they like. |
| 02-26-12 (Fynjy) Reply |
Just passing by, no intent to start flame wars (especially that I don't care about all the cover voting). But I just couldn't resist saying that DeepBlueGaze's maths is kinda wrong. :D
No matter how many variants of vote you have, the "offset from 0" (1 2 3 4 vs. 7 8 9 10) doesn't matter really. The arithmetic average doesn't work that way - for 1 1 4 4 (2 great 2 awful), for example, you'll get 2.5; for 7 7 10 10 (the same!) you'll get 8.5 (the same!) - the offset is in every number so it doesn't anyhow affect the "weight" of good or bad marks.
If you want to shift balance in arithmetic average, use different _intervals_ between numbers - like 0 4 7 9 10, as an example (but "label" them as 1 2 3 4 5, awful-bad-average-good-great). This way, even "medium" votes tend to weight towards "good" rating. |
| 02-21-12 (am4getful) Reply |
| At risk of changing the discussion to a more serious topic .... Has Natalia retired as a model? It's been over nine months since she had a new update set. She began appearing over four years ago, and four or five years is frequently as long as a girl models. |
| 02-15-12 (russell) Reply |
| DeepBlueGaze - as I said to blue parrot, can we leave it for a bit and see what happens over time? (:R |
| 02-14-12 (DeepBlueGaze) Reply |
As often, blue parrot is the voice of reason. 10 different values are too much and useless. People use 8, 9, or 10 when they like, but 1 when they don't. So, in this system, a negative vote has 3 to 4 times the weight of a positive one.
A solution: uses only 1, 2, 3, or 4 stars, but when the average is computed, adds 6 to the rating: * -> 7, ** -> 8, *** -> 9, **** -> 10
With the actual system: (8 x 3 + 1) / 4 = 6.25, or a loss of 1.75 with only 1 negative rating. With 3 more 8, the mean is still rather low: (8 x 6 + 1) / 7 = 7.0, or a loss of 1.0.
With my proposition, (*** x 3 + *) -> (9 x 3 + 7) / 4 = 8.5, or a loss of only 0.5.
With a 3 more ***, the mean is (9 x 6 + 7) / 7 = 8.7. It's still a hard stroke but psychologically more acceptable.
And for the ranking, I think you should add dummy votes, not a threshold.
That said, if I were you, I would use a thumb up, with no negative rating possible. Just a way to say: hey this cover is really great. It's enough.
Also, for this and for the vote for the models, I suggest that you accept only one vote per day for a domain (192.0.1.xxx)
|
| 02-14-12 (russell) Reply |
| blue parrot - ok, I take on board what your saying but can we agree to drop this now for a month or so to see how it pans out? (:R |
| 02-14-12 (blue parrot) Reply |
| Russell, I did, but the problem - with the system as it is set now - is that the Top 10 Covers will very much depend on the last 10 min or even less of the voting in the month as the covers with few but higher votes will likely dominate the chart. And who will remain in the top 10 will be highly arbitrary - so not something really worthwhile. One option - if you want to stick to averages - would be to set the threshold not at 3 votes, but at 100 votes or so (I think you should spell this rule out in faq to make it transparent). Then the last-minute intrusions at the end of the month would be less probable, although you are still facing the problem of deliberate voting against the model (which is a bit destructive). And don't get me wrong - I know it's only for fun - but still it is good to have rules that somehow make sense + you have created a eally nice site and thank you for it, bp |
| 02-14-12 (russell) Reply |
| blue parrot - did you read the FAQ? (:R |
|
| Read all |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |  |
| 1. |
METART
Jenya D - Dominez |
| 2. |
METART
Jenya D - Capello |
| 3. |
METART
Sabrina D - Kilamis |
| 4. |
METART
Jenya D - Cover |
| 5. |
METART
Jenya D - Makos |
| 6. |
METART
Nastya I - New Model Nastya |
| 7. |
METART
Sabrina D - Riviera |
| 8. |
FEMJOY
Angelina B - Feel Me |
| 9. |
METART
Leila A - Presenting Leila |
| 10. |
TLE
Abby - Forest Nymph |
|
|
|
